This is an archive of the Maximo Yahoo Community. The content of this pages may be a sometimes obsolete so please check post dates.
Thanks to the community owner Christopher Wanko for providing the content.
What type of specs? Could meters be used to record the specs for a workorder?
Shannon Sutton
Cell: 571-970-7965
On May 10, 2012, at 5:40 PM, "cbrandon63" <cbrandon63@yahoo.com> wrote:
> We have a new requirement to implement QA verification of work orders on molding tools.
>
> Basically, when maintenance does any work on a molding tool the QA group must verify that the mold tool is producing parts within spec.
>
> My thought was to add "QA" specifications to each tool (asset), but how do I get those brought into the workorder for QA enter their specs and compare against. The work order cannot be complete until they are.
>
> Also would like be able to have the ability to generate a child work order when the tool is not in spec.
>
> This is a new process to me. Is anyone doing anything like this? Would you be willing to share your experience?
>
>
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error,
please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any
hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly,
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are
not the intended recipient.
Was thinking meters and condition monitoring points could have been used to generate a corrective work order but would that mean that several corrective work orders might be generated for that one inspection work order if several meter values were not in spec?
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, Shannon Sutton <ssutton@...> wrote:
>
> What type of specs? Could meters be used to record the specs for a workorder?
>
>
>
> Shannon Sutton
> Cell: 571-970-7965
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 5:40 PM, "cbrandon63" <cbrandon63@...> wrote:
>
> > We have a new requirement to implement QA verification of work orders on molding tools.
> >
> > Basically, when maintenance does any work on a molding tool the QA group must verify that the mold tool is producing parts within spec.
> >
> > My thought was to add "QA" specifications to each tool (asset), but how do I get those brought into the workorder for QA enter their specs and compare against. The work order cannot be complete until they are.
> >
> > Also would like be able to have the ability to generate a child work order when the tool is not in spec.
> >
> > This is a new process to me. Is anyone doing anything like this? Would you be willing to share your experience?
> >
> >
>
> This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
> proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
> is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error,
> please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any
> hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly,
> use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are
> not the intended recipient.
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
We have to certify that we have checked for tools, materials and debris after working on the production lines and if a supervisor needs to check the area.
We added some fields SANINOTIFIED, SANITATIONCHECK and TOOLCHECK to the work order table. The last two are Y/N fields that the operators have to check off. TOOLCHECK indicates that a check was made for tools, materials and debris. This must always be checked to Y. SANITATIONCHECK is checked to indicate a supervisor has to check the area and when it is checked then SANINOTIFIED is a field where they must choose a person record to indicate who they notified.
In application designer we then put signature options and conditional properties in place to enable and disable the change status. So until the fields are filled in to satisfy the QA requirements users cannot change the status to COMP.
So you could do something like this to add a condition where if the asset on the work order had a specification of QACHECKREQ = 1 then the work order could not be completed until the QA check field was changed to Y. Then have a signature option and condition that only the user in the QACHECK security group could change.
Once they had checked off the QA check then enable the change status.
Dave Bone
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, "Sonia" <salkhal@...> wrote:
>
> Was thinking meters and condition monitoring points could have been used to generate a corrective work order but would that mean that several corrective work orders might be generated for that one inspection work order if several meter values were not in spec?
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, Shannon Sutton <ssutton@> wrote:
> >
> > What type of specs? Could meters be used to record the specs for a workorder?
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon Sutton
> > Cell: 571-970-7965
> >
> > On May 10, 2012, at 5:40 PM, "cbrandon63" <cbrandon63@> wrote:
> >
> > > We have a new requirement to implement QA verification of work orders on molding tools.
> > >
> > > Basically, when maintenance does any work on a molding tool the QA group must verify that the mold tool is producing parts within spec.
> > >
> > > My thought was to add "QA" specifications to each tool (asset), but how do I get those brought into the workorder for QA enter their specs and compare against. The work order cannot be complete until they are.
> > >
> > > Also would like be able to have the ability to generate a child work order when the tool is not in spec.
> > >
> > > This is a new process to me. Is anyone doing anything like this? Would you be willing to share your experience?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
> > proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
> > is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error,
> > please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any
> > hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly,
> > use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are
> > not the intended recipient.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>