This is an archive of the Maximo Yahoo Community. The content of this pages may be a sometimes obsolete so please check post dates.
Thanks to the community owner Christopher Wanko for providing the content.
I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report) is required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's, and entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this work?
I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
Well, that's interesting.
You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and then
to POLINE.PLIN1.
I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but it
sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that part
of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
ahtnamas74
Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report) is
required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating
new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's, and
entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the
text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this
work?
I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
Hi Shannon,
Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom crossover
using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from pr
using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
CMIIMW.
Best Regards,
Yudi Irianto
"Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@yahoo.ca>
Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
11-05-2012 09:41
Please respond to
MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
To
<MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Well, that's interesting.
You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
then
to POLINE.PLIN1.
I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but it
sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that part
of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
ahtnamas74
Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
is
required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating
new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
and
entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the
text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this
work?
I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yudi.irianto@ytljt.com
Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Hi Shannon,
Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom crossover
using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from pr
using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
CMIIMW.
Best Regards,
Yudi Irianto
"Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@yahoo.ca <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
11-05-2012 09:41
Please respond to
MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
To
<MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
cc
Subject
RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Well, that's interesting.
You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
then
to POLINE.PLIN1.
I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but it
sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that part
of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
ahtnamas74
Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
is
required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating
new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
and
entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the
text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this
work?
I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already exists. As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@...> wrote:
>
> I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
>
>
>
> It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Shannon
>
>
>
> From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yudi.irianto@...
> Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Shannon,
>
> Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom crossover
> using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from pr
> using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> CMIIMW.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Yudi Irianto
>
>
>
> "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@... <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> 11-05-2012 09:41
> Please respond to
> MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
>
>
> To
> <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, that's interesting.
>
> You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> then
> to POLINE.PLIN1.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but it
> sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
>
> The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that part
> of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
> suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
>
> Shannon
>
> From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
> ahtnamas74
> Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
> I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
> print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
> is
> required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
> experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating
> new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
>
> I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
> and
> entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the
> text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this
> work?
>
> I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It needs to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, "Jason Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already exists. As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
has been removed though .
Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either - did
you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
birdiemum
Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It needs
to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already exists.
As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but
he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on
the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should
apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but
it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
We have use the crossover from IN20 to RLIN2 and IN22 to RLIN 4 for a long
time. We are currently upgrading to 7.5 and have them as crossover values in
a domain. I did not remove them from the domain to test if they still work
through the MBO but they do work in the domain. We use them to copy a value
for each item to the PRLINE and from there to the RFQLINE, POLINE,
appropriate Trans table and INVOICELINE.
I found that the upgrade kept the extra fields i.e. IN19 if you had data in
the field at the time of the upgrade. If had data in the fields that were
crossover fields in the previous version it added the value to the crossover
domain.
All of the crossovers are working in our v7.5 the same as the current v6.2.
Kevin
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Shannon Rotz
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:40 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
has been removed though .
Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either - did
you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
birdiemum
Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It needs
to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already exists.
As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but
he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on
the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should
apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but
it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
I think you're confirming my theory, Kevin.
If I get you right: you're using a standard (V6-V7) custom crossover from
IN20 to RLIN2 and from IN22 to RLIN4.
Once the value is in RLIN4, it's copied from PRLINE to RFQLINE, POLINE,
Trans Table and INVOICELINE using the legacy crossover code - correct? You
don't have a V6-7 crossover set up for the PRLIINE to RFQLINE transfer?
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Kevin Egolf
Sent: May-11-12 5:47 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
We have use the crossover from IN20 to RLIN2 and IN22 to RLIN 4 for a long
time. We are currently upgrading to 7.5 and have them as crossover values in
a domain. I did not remove them from the domain to test if they still work
through the MBO but they do work in the domain. We use them to copy a value
for each item to the PRLINE and from there to the RFQLINE, POLINE,
appropriate Trans table and INVOICELINE.
I found that the upgrade kept the extra fields i.e. IN19 if you had data in
the field at the time of the upgrade. If had data in the fields that were
crossover fields in the previous version it added the value to the crossover
domain.
All of the crossovers are working in our v7.5 the same as the current v6.2.
Kevin
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
Shannon Rotz
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:40 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
has been removed though .
Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either - did
you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
birdiemum
Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It needs
to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already exists.
As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but
he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on
the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should
apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but
it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Dear all,
Referred to onlinedoc for V.5:
ITEM PRLINE POLINE MATRECTRANS/MATUSETRANS
IN19 > RLIN1 > PLIN1 > ITIN1
IN20 > RLIN2 > PLIN2 > ITIN2
IN21 > RLIN3 > PLIN3 > ITIN3
IN22 > RLIN4 > PLIN4
IN23 > RLIN5 > PLIN5
IN24 > RLIN6 > PLIN6 > ITIN4
IN25 > RLIN7 > PLIN7 > ITIN5
IN26 > RLIN8 > PLIN8 > ITIN6
IN27 > RLIN9 > PLIN9 > ITIN7
cmiiw
Best Regards,
Yudi Irianto
"Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@yahoo.ca>
Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
12-05-2012 15:56
Please respond to
MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
To
<MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I think you're confirming my theory, Kevin.
If I get you right: you're using a standard (V6-V7) custom crossover from
IN20 to RLIN2 and from IN22 to RLIN4.
Once the value is in RLIN4, it's copied from PRLINE to RFQLINE, POLINE,
Trans Table and INVOICELINE using the legacy crossover code - correct? You
don't have a V6-7 crossover set up for the PRLIINE to RFQLINE transfer?
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Kevin Egolf
Sent: May-11-12 5:47 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
We have use the crossover from IN20 to RLIN2 and IN22 to RLIN 4 for a long
time. We are currently upgrading to 7.5 and have them as crossover values
in
a domain. I did not remove them from the domain to test if they still work
through the MBO but they do work in the domain. We use them to copy a
value
for each item to the PRLINE and from there to the RFQLINE, POLINE,
appropriate Trans table and INVOICELINE.
I found that the upgrade kept the extra fields i.e. IN19 if you had data
in
the field at the time of the upgrade. If had data in the fields that were
crossover fields in the previous version it added the value to the
crossover
domain.
All of the crossovers are working in our v7.5 the same as the current
v6.2.
Kevin
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of
Shannon Rotz
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:40 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
has been removed though .
Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either -
did
you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
birdiemum
Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It
needs
to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already
exists.
As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE,
but
he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field
on
the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers
should
apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine &
POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there,
but
it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I
would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will
ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test
Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings
and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and
PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Yep – those are the ones.
Only what I think the original poster (ahtnamas74 – what’s your real name?) and Jason are saying is: even though the documentation says that IN19 should cross over to RLIN1, it’s not doing that in V7. It rather sounds like IBM removed that part of the code. Well, that’s OK – a standard V7 custom crossover would work for that part.
The crossovers from RLIN1 to PLIN1, etc., are still working, which is more important.
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yudi.irianto@ytljt.com
Sent: May-13-12 3:08 AM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Dear all,
Referred to onlinedoc for V.5:
ITEM PRLINE POLINE MATRECTRANS/MATUSETRANS
IN19 > RLIN1 > PLIN1 > ITIN1
IN20 > RLIN2 > PLIN2 > ITIN2
IN21 > RLIN3 > PLIN3 > ITIN3
IN22 > RLIN4 > PLIN4
IN23 > RLIN5 > PLIN5
IN24 > RLIN6 > PLIN6 > ITIN4
IN25 > RLIN7 > PLIN7 > ITIN5
IN26 > RLIN8 > PLIN8 > ITIN6
IN27 > RLIN9 > PLIN9 > ITIN7
cmiiw
Best Regards,
Yudi Irianto
"Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@yahoo.ca <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
12-05-2012 15:56
Please respond to
MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
To
<MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
cc
Subject
RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I think you're confirming my theory, Kevin.
If I get you right: you're using a standard (V6-V7) custom crossover from
IN20 to RLIN2 and from IN22 to RLIN4.
Once the value is in RLIN4, it's copied from PRLINE to RFQLINE, POLINE,
Trans Table and INVOICELINE using the legacy crossover code - correct? You
don't have a V6-7 crossover set up for the PRLIINE to RFQLINE transfer?
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
Kevin Egolf
Sent: May-11-12 5:47 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
We have use the crossover from IN20 to RLIN2 and IN22 to RLIN 4 for a long
time. We are currently upgrading to 7.5 and have them as crossover values
in
a domain. I did not remove them from the domain to test if they still work
through the MBO but they do work in the domain. We use them to copy a
value
for each item to the PRLINE and from there to the RFQLINE, POLINE,
appropriate Trans table and INVOICELINE.
I found that the upgrade kept the extra fields i.e. IN19 if you had data
in
the field at the time of the upgrade. If had data in the fields that were
crossover fields in the previous version it added the value to the
crossover
domain.
All of the crossovers are working in our v7.5 the same as the current
v6.2.
Kevin
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of
Shannon Rotz
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:40 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
has been removed though .
Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either -
did
you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
birdiemum
Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It
needs
to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already
exists.
As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE,
but
he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field
on
the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers
should
apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine &
POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there,
but
it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I
would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will
ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test
Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings
and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and
PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Shannon
You are correct. We do not have a crossover domain for PRLINE to RFQLINE or
from RFQLINE to POLINE. Our testing shows that the data from the extra
fields PRLINE1, PRLINE2. etc. copy to the RFQLINE, POLINE, trans tables and
INVOICELINE as they did in the previous versions.
We do have a crossover from PRLINE directly to POLINE. I do not know when it
was added or if it happened during a previous upgrade. I did some testing
and the crossover function from PRLINE to POLINE does not work without the
crossover. ( I removed some fields from the crossover domain).
So it looks like if you use the full functionality and go from PR to RFQ to
PO the legacy crossovers work. if you want to go directly from PR to PO you
have to create a crossover domain.
If anyone experiences different functionality please chime in.
Kevin
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Shannon Rotz
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 4:57 AM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I think you're confirming my theory, Kevin.
If I get you right: you're using a standard (V6-V7) custom crossover from
IN20 to RLIN2 and from IN22 to RLIN4.
Once the value is in RLIN4, it's copied from PRLINE to RFQLINE, POLINE,
Trans Table and INVOICELINE using the legacy crossover code - correct? You
don't have a V6-7 crossover set up for the PRLIINE to RFQLINE transfer?
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
Kevin Egolf
Sent: May-11-12 5:47 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
We have use the crossover from IN20 to RLIN2 and IN22 to RLIN 4 for a long
time. We are currently upgrading to 7.5 and have them as crossover values in
a domain. I did not remove them from the domain to test if they still work
through the MBO but they do work in the domain. We use them to copy a value
for each item to the PRLINE and from there to the RFQLINE, POLINE,
appropriate Trans table and INVOICELINE.
I found that the upgrade kept the extra fields i.e. IN19 if you had data in
the field at the time of the upgrade. If had data in the fields that were
crossover fields in the previous version it added the value to the crossover
domain.
All of the crossovers are working in our v7.5 the same as the current v6.2.
Kevin
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
Shannon Rotz
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:40 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
has been removed though .
Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either - did
you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
Shannon
From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of
birdiemum
Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It needs
to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
Verly" <jason.verly@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already exists.
As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE, but
he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field on
the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers should
apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of yudi.irianto@
> > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Shannon,
> >
> > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
crossover
> > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
pr
> > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
> > CMIIMW.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Yudi Irianto
> >
> >
> >
> > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > Please respond to
> > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >
> > To
> > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, that's interesting.
> >
> > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > then
> > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there, but
it
> > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> >
> > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
part
> > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I would
> > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> >
> > Shannon
> >
> > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> > ahtnamas74
> > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> >
> > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately
> > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report)
> > is
> > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and
> > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
creating
> > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
not.
> >
> > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's,
> > and
> > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
the
> > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
this
> > work?
> >
> > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Correct, I have both crossovers but they are not working as stated. I plan to start digging into why they don't work this week.
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@...> wrote:
>
> Yep â" those are the ones.
>
>
>
> Only what I think the original poster (ahtnamas74 â" whatâs your real name?) and Jason are saying is: even though the documentation says that IN19 should cross over to RLIN1, itâs not doing that in V7. It rather sounds like IBM removed that part of the code. Well, thatâs OK â" a standard V7 custom crossover would work for that part.
>
>
>
> The crossovers from RLIN1 to PLIN1, etc., are still working, which is more important.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yudi.irianto@...
> Sent: May-13-12 3:08 AM
> To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Referred to onlinedoc for V.5:
>
> ITEM PRLINE POLINE MATRECTRANS/MATUSETRANS
> IN19 > RLIN1 > PLIN1 > ITIN1
> IN20 > RLIN2 > PLIN2 > ITIN2
> IN21 > RLIN3 > PLIN3 > ITIN3
> IN22 > RLIN4 > PLIN4
> IN23 > RLIN5 > PLIN5
> IN24 > RLIN6 > PLIN6 > ITIN4
> IN25 > RLIN7 > PLIN7 > ITIN5
> IN26 > RLIN8 > PLIN8 > ITIN6
> IN27 > RLIN9 > PLIN9 > ITIN7
>
>
> cmiiw
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Yudi Irianto
>
>
>
> "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@... <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> 12-05-2012 15:56
> Please respond to
> MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
>
>
> To
> <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think you're confirming my theory, Kevin.
>
> If I get you right: you're using a standard (V6-V7) custom crossover from
> IN20 to RLIN2 and from IN22 to RLIN4.
>
> Once the value is in RLIN4, it's copied from PRLINE to RFQLINE, POLINE,
> Trans Table and INVOICELINE using the legacy crossover code - correct? You
> don't have a V6-7 crossover set up for the PRLIINE to RFQLINE transfer?
>
> Shannon
>
> From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Egolf
> Sent: May-11-12 5:47 PM
> To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
> We have use the crossover from IN20 to RLIN2 and IN22 to RLIN 4 for a long
> time. We are currently upgrading to 7.5 and have them as crossover values
> in
> a domain. I did not remove them from the domain to test if they still work
> through the MBO but they do work in the domain. We use them to copy a
> value
> for each item to the PRLINE and from there to the RFQLINE, POLINE,
> appropriate Trans table and INVOICELINE.
>
> I found that the upgrade kept the extra fields i.e. IN19 if you had data
> in
> the field at the time of the upgrade. If had data in the fields that were
> crossover fields in the previous version it added the value to the
> crossover
> domain.
>
> All of the crossovers are working in our v7.5 the same as the current
> v6.2.
>
> Kevin
>
> From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> Of
> Shannon Rotz
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:40 PM
> To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
> Actually, in past there have been some built-in crossovers, i.e. they
> crossed over automatically, left over from legacy versions. They're
> undocumented in V5 onwards, but a bunch of them still work, such as the
> RLIN1 to PLIN1 crossover. Apparently the IN19 to RLIN1 automatic crossover
> has been removed though .
>
> Jason: when you say you couldn't get the crossovers to trigger either -
> did
> you mean from ITEM to PRLINE, or from PRLINE to POLINE? The last time I
> checked, the PRLINE to POLINE crossovers still worked.
>
> Shannon
>
> From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of
> birdiemum
> Sent: May-11-12 12:00 PM
> To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
>
> PLN1 is the same as IN19, but there's no domain on that attribute. It
> needs
> to have a crossover domain to actually populate the field.
>
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21261928
>
> --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Jason
> Verly" <jason.verly@> wrote:
> >
> > Here's the funny thing, the crossover from IN19 to PRLIN1 already
> exists.
> As well as the PRLINE to POLINE crossover for PRLIN1 to PLIN1. I tested it
> out and I can't get the crossovers to trigger correctly either.
> >
> > --- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Shannon
> Rotz" <shannonrotz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree that custom crossovers are hard to do for PRLINE to POLINE,
> but
> he was asking about the ITEM to PRLINE stage.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It should be easy to create a crossover from IN19 (or a custom field
> on
> the ITEM table) to PRLINE.RLIN1. After that, the built-in crossovers
> should
> apply, and the data should automatically cross over to POLINE.PLIN1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Shannon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of yudi.irianto@
> > > Sent: May-10-12 7:55 PM
> > > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Cc: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine &
> POLine
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Shannon,
> > >
> > > Refered to that case, i suppose that you can not create a custom
> crossover
> > > using a crossover domain. Copying prline to poline or creating po from
> pr
> > > using "a-closed-loop" mechanism which not supported by
> > > crossover-field-method. Afaik crossover-domain triggers action method,
>
> > > CMIIMW.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Yudi Irianto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Shannon Rotz" <shannonrotz@ <mailto:shannonrotz%40yahoo.ca> >
> > > Sent by: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > 11-05-2012 09:41
> > > Please respond to
> > > MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > RE: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, that's interesting.
> > >
> > > You are correct: it should be ITEM.IN19 that goes to PRLINE.RLIN1, and
>
> > > then
> > > to POLINE.PLIN1.
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure that the PRLINE to POLINE crossover is still there,
> but
> it
> > > sounds like they may have removed the ITEM to PRLINE one.
> > >
> > > The good news is that it's easy to set up a custom crossover for that
> part
> > > of the equation - it's the PRLINE to POLINE one that's hard. So I
> would
> > > suggest just setting up a regular crossover for that part.
> > >
> > > Shannon
> > >
> > > From: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf Of
> > > ahtnamas74
> > > Sent: May-10-12 12:19 PM
> > > To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:MAXIMO%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
> > >
> > > I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the
> > > Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will
> ultimately
> > > print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test
> Report)
>
> > > is
> > > required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings
> and
> > > experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of
> creating
> > > new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and
> > > POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's
> not.
> > >
> > > I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and
> PO's,
> > > and
> > > entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO,
> the
> > > text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting
> this
> > > work?
> > >
> > > I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Thanks for all the input and I'm sorry to say that I'm glad it just isn't me that the crossovers aren't working for.
My intent is to be able to check a box on the item screen and then everytime that item is ordered a check box will be displayed on the PO telling the vendor that when they ship this item, additional documentation is required.
Samantha
"Tell the vendor additional documentation is required" ...
If this is the goal then could you not have POprint report modified (which should be the key document given to vendor) and insert new instructional line whenever a specialty Item is ordered.
The report can read the flag on Item table once the Item is on POline record.
Or perhaps you want the Buyer to see this and verbally communicate ...
Sent on the Sprint� Now Network from my BlackBerry�
-----Original Message-----
From: "ahtnamas74" <ahtnamas74@yahoo.com>
Sender: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:04:11
To: <MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
Thanks for all the input and I'm sorry to say that I'm glad it just isn't me that the crossovers aren't working for.
My intent is to be able to check a box on the item screen and then everytime that item is ordered a check box will be displayed on the PO telling the vendor that when they ship this item, additional documentation is required.
Samantha
If your intent is to ultimately print the information on the PO\PR, then just edit your report.
If your intent is to also show those fields on the PO\PR application and it is not necessary to save this info with the PO\PR or edit it from the PO\PR then use a relationship so it displays in those apps.
I really don't see the value of saving that info with the PO\PR since it is already in column\s in the item master....(unless I am missing something)
Wes Williams
http://www.weswilliams.net
http://www.williamsconnell.com
________________________________
From: ahtnamas74 <ahtnamas74@yahoo.com>
To: MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:19 PM
Subject: [MAXIMO List] Crossover Fields from Item to PRLine & POLine
I need a set of fields that will work similar and in addition to the Inspection Required for Item, PR's and PO's. This field will ultimately print on the PO and will tell the vendor if a MTR (Material Test Report) is required for the material being ordered. From reading past postings and experience, I know it is better to use existing fields instead of creating new fields for crossovers. I believe that Item.IN19, PRLINE.RLIN1, and POLINE.PLIN1 should be my fields to make this magic happen, but it's not.
I have added these fields to the screens in Item Master, PR's and PO's, and entered text for a few items. But when I create a new PR or even a PO, the text entered at the Item does not follow. Any suggestions for getting this work?
I'm using Maximo 7.1.1.7