This is an archive of the Maximo Yahoo Community. The content of this pages may be a sometimes obsolete so please check post dates.
Thanks to the community owner Christopher Wanko for providing the content.
TWO TYPES OF ASSET (REPAIR) MAINTENANCE
Recognizing the various work types we have on a work order, there may be value in (also) categorizing repair maintenance as two types.
The first one is functional failure, e.g. loss of output, resulting in an unplanned/unscheduled event.
The second repair type might be purposefully initiated based on predictive-analysis or condition-based data. The good news is that this second type can be properly planned and scheduled which is proactive in nature.
There may be value in tracking this distinction as a metric.
w/br
John Reeve
Manager, Practice Leader Maintenance and Reliability Solutions
Cell: 423 314 1312
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-reeve/11/644/9b2
The functional failure resulting unplanned maintenance could be divided
into corrective or repairing the asset and replace the asset...and the
condition based could be change the part of the asset or modify the
asset...right?
Warm Regards,
Juniko W Batista
PT. INFOGLOBAL AUTOPTIMA
JAKARTA TIMUR
INDONESIA
On Nov 24, 2012 12:19 PM, "John" <planschd@yahoo.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
> TWO TYPES OF ASSET (REPAIR) MAINTENANCE
>
> Recognizing the various work types we have on a work order, there may be
> value in (also) categorizing repair maintenance as two types.
> The first one is functional failure, e.g. loss of output, resulting in an
> unplanned/unscheduled event.
> The second repair type might be purposefully initiated based on
> predictive-analysis or condition-based data. The good news is that this
> second type can be properly planned and scheduled which is proactive in
> nature.
> There may be value in tracking this distinction as a metric.
>
> w/br
> John Reeve
> Manager, Practice Leader Maintenance and Reliability Solutions
> Cell: 423 314 1312
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-reeve/11/644/9b2
>
>
>
I think the primary focus is to differentiate between reactive and proactive work. There is usually a higher cost associated with reactive work, which can be due to expediting, unproductive/uncoordinated activities, as well as possible worker injury. This type of work interrupts other scheduled work.
Note: tip of the day # 19 talks about repair/replace
--- In MAXIMO@yahoogroups.com, Juniko <juniko@...> wrote:
>
> The functional failure resulting unplanned maintenance could be divided
> into corrective or repairing the asset and replace the asset...and the
> condition based could be change the part of the asset or modify the
> asset...right?
>
> Warm Regards,
> Juniko W Batista
>
> PT. INFOGLOBAL AUTOPTIMA
> JAKARTA TIMUR
> INDONESIA
> On Nov 24, 2012 12:19 PM, "John" <planschd@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > TWO TYPES OF ASSET (REPAIR) MAINTENANCE
> >
> > Recognizing the various work types we have on a work order, there may be
> > value in (also) categorizing repair maintenance as two types.
> > The first one is functional failure, e.g. loss of output, resulting in an
> > unplanned/unscheduled event.
> > The second repair type might be purposefully initiated based on
> > predictive-analysis or condition-based data. The good news is that this
> > second type can be properly planned and scheduled which is proactive in
> > nature.
> > There may be value in tracking this distinction as a metric.
> >
> > w/br
> > John Reeve
> > Manager, Practice Leader Maintenance and Reliability Solutions
> > Cell: 423 314 1312
> > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-reeve/11/644/9b2
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>